Key question: How can defendants successfully challenge illegally obtained evidence through a motion to suppress under California Penal Code § 1538.5?
Short answer: Darren Chaker analyzes five key cases impacting motions to suppress evidence in California, covering Fourth Amendment protections, search and seizure law, and how courts apply the exclusionary rule to protect defendants’ constitutional rights.
An illegal search is often challenged in a Motion to Suppress Evidence, California Penal Code § 1538.5 provides a crucial legal mechanism for defendants to challenge evidence obtained through potentially unlawful searches or seizures. This article by brief writer Darren Chaker expands goes into the intricacies of suppression motions and their significance in criminal defense, while also noting to not rely on this article as it is just a summary of cases, and you should always hire an attorney who is familiar with all of the facts of your case.
For almost two decades Darren Chaker regularly has worked with defense attorneys and high net worth people on a variety of sensitive issues from Los Angeles to Dubai. With a gift of knowledge about the First Amendment and big firm expertise in brief research and writing, Darren Chaker puts his knowledge to use for law firms and non-profit organizations.